Gopal, Neethu

There are many lesions that cause compression of nerves and vessels in the head and neck, and they can often be overlooked in the absence of adequate history or if not suspected by the radiologist. Many of these lesions require a high index of suspicion and optimal positioning for imaging. While a multimodality approach is critical in the evaluation of compressive lesions, an MRI utilizing high-resolution (heavily weighted) T2-weighted sequence is extremely useful as a starting point. In this review, we aim to discuss the radiological features of the common and uncommon compressive lesions of the head and neck which are broadly categorized into vascular, osseous, and miscellaneous etiologies.

Background: Migraine is associated with neuroimaging differences in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). However, it is unknown if migraine-related disability (MRD) or if calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a vasoactive peptide important in migraine pathology, have radiographic implications. The aims of this study were to identify whether MRD or interictal serum CGRP levels impacted neuroimaging findings for those with CADASIL. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed. The primary outcomes were neuroimaging differences associated with MRD among those with migraine or interictal serum CGRP levels of those with and without migraine. MRD was defined by 2 migraine disability scales (Migraine Disability Assessment, Headache Impact Test-6). Retrospective brain magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed (average 1.7 ± 2.0 y before enrollment). Rank-sum and χ2 tests were used. Results: Those with migraine (n=25, vs. n=14 without) were younger [median 49 (25 to 82) y vs. 60 (31 to 82) y, P<0.007], had fewer cerebral microbleeds (0 to 31 vs. 0 to 50, P=0.02) and less frequently had anterior temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [68% (17/25) vs 100% (14/14), P=0.02]. MRD scale outcomes had no significant radiographic associations. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ (migraine: n=18, 27.0±9.6 pg/mL vs. no migraine: n=10, 26.8±15.7 pg/mL, P=0.965). Conclusions: Migraine may forestall microangiopathy in CADASIL, though possibly independent of severity as measured by MRD. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ in our cohort suggesting CGRP may not be vital to migraine pathophysiology in CADASIL. Larger studies are needed to account for age differences.

While abnormalities of the hippocampus have been well characterized in temporal lobe epilepsy, various additional temporal lobe abnormalities have also been described. One poorly understood entity, the so-called temporal pole blurring (TPB), is one of the more frequently described neocortical abnormalities in TLE and is thought to represent dysmyelination and axonal loss due to chronic electrical perturbations in early age-onset temporal lobe epilepsy. In this study, we describe the first reported cases of TPB diagnosed by a recently described MRI sequence known as 3D Edge-Enhancing Gradient Echo (3D-EDGE), which has an effective “myelin weighting” making it exquisitely sensitive to this temporal pole dysmyelination. The value of detection of TPB lies in lateralizing seizure onset, as well as predicting a lower baseline neuropsychological performance compared to temporal lobe epilepsy without TPB. Additionally, it is critical to not mistake TPB for alternative diagnoses, such as focal cortical dysplasia or neoplasm.

Objective: To characterize migraine in patients with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Background: CADASIL serves as a key model of a monoallelic stroke disease. A portion of patients have coexistent migraine with aura, yet the relationship between migraine and the pathophysiology of CADASIL is poorly understood. Design/Methods: We performed a prospective study of adults with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CADASIL, age-matched controls with migraine with aura (MA), and headache-free controls. The Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were used to quantify migraine-related disability. Subjects were followed for one year after enrollment. Results: We enrolled 88 subjects, which included 33 subjects with CADASIL, 32 subjects without CADASIL but with MA, and 23 control subjects without CADASIL or MA. Mean age was 53.6 (range, 22-86), 64.8% (57/88) were females, and 83% (73/88) were white. Of the CADASIL subjects, 61% (20/33) suffered from MA (CAD/+MA). Aura semiology amongst the CAD/+MA and MA patients were as follows: visual (80% vs 81%), sensory (75% vs 81%), speech (75% vs 50%), motor (30% vs 50%), brain stem (60% vs 81%) and retinal (30% vs 25%). Mean MIDAS scores at enrollment were comparable between the CAD/+MA and MA populations (32.3 vs 33.5), as were mean HIT-6 scores (56.3 vs 56.9). Discussion: These preliminary results do not show a significant difference in migraine disability between CADASIL migraineurs and chronic migraineurs. Minor differences were observed in aura distribution between the two groups, although further investigations are needed to better understand the underlying pathology of CADASIL and migraine.

AbstractObjective Video recording and video recognition (VR) with computer vision have become widely used in many aspects of modern life. Hospitals have employed VR technology for security purposes, however, despite the growing number of studies showing the feasibility of VR software for physiologic monitoring or detection of patient movement, its use in the intensive care unit (ICU) in real-time is sparse and the perception of this novel technology is unknown. The objective of this study is to understand the attitudes of providers, patients, and patient's families toward using VR in the ICU.Design A 10-question survey instrument was used and distributed into two groups of participants: clinicians (MDs, advance practice providers, registered nurses), patients and families (adult patients and patients' relatives). Questions were specifically worded and section for free text-comments created to elicit respondents' thoughts and attitudes on potential issues and barriers toward implementation of VR in the ICU.Setting The survey was conducted at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota and Florida.Results A total of 233 clinicians' and 50 patients' surveys were collected. Both cohorts favored VR under specific circumstances (e.g., invasive intervention and diagnostic manipulation). Acceptable reasons for VR usage according to clinicians were anticipated positive impact on patient safety (70%), and diagnostic suggestions and decision support (51%). A minority of providers was concerned that artificial intelligence (AI) would replace their job (14%) or erode professional skills (28%). The potential use of VR in lawsuits (81% clinicians) and privacy breaches (59% patients) were major areas of concern. Further identified barriers were lack of trust for AI, deterioration of the patient–clinician rapport. Patients agreed with VR unless it does not reduce nursing care or record sensitive scenarios.Conclusion The survey provides valuable information on the acceptance of VR cameras in the critical care setting including an overview of real concerns and attitudes toward the use of VR technology in the ICU.